| Vol. 29 (March 2011) |
| ・ |
Recent IP Trends in Lithium-Ion Batteries |
| |
|
Battery technology has been drawing much
attention as a next-generation energy source. In particular, lithium-ion
batteries are expected to be in high demand in the market, encouraged by an
increased demand for hybrid cars and electric vehicles in order to achieve CO2
emission reduction goals. In this issue, we feature recent IP trends in
lithium-ion batteries based on a research report published by the JPO. |
| ・ |
Recent Trends in IP High Court Judgments regarding Inventive Step |
| |
|
In the past, the IP High Court tended to
be strict in their judgments regarding inventive step. However, in view of
recent IP High Court judgments, it seems that the criteria regarding inventive
step have become more relaxed. In this issue, we report on recent trends
in IP high Court judgments concerning inventive step, and the impact they have
on JPO practice. |
| Download(812KB) |
|
| Vol. 28 (March 2010) |
| ・ |
Recent trends in Nanotechnology Related Applications
(Carbon Nanotubes) |
| |
|
The number of patents related to
nanotechnology registered at the JPO has been rapidly increasing in
recent years. In particular, carbon nanotubes are drawing much attention
and Japanese applicants are very active in filing patent applications
related to carbon nanotubes. This issue discusses the recent trends in
patent applications related to carbon nanotubes. |
| ・ |
Revision of Examination Guidelines for “Industrially
Applicable Inventions” and “Medical Inventions” |
| |
|
“Methods for treatment of the human
body by surgery or therapy and diagnostic methods practiced on humans”
(medical activities) are not patentable in Japan. However, due to the
rapid development of medical technology, there is a need to reconsider
and clarify the scope of patentable subject matter in the examination
guidelines. The examination guidelines for industrially applicable
inventions and medical inventions were revised on October 23, 2009. This
article explains the details of the revisions announced by the JPO. |
| ・ |
Recent Court Case: Guidelines for Trials for Correction
(IP High Court Decisions: Heisei 19-(2007)-10163, Heisei
20-(2008)-10456, and Heisei 21-(2009)-10157) |
| |
|
This article discusses key issues
in a recent noteworthy case concerning Trials for Correction which our firm had
been involved in. |
| Download(331KB) |
|
| Vol. 27 (September 2009) |
| ・ |
Recent IP Trends in Bio-Based Polymers |
| |
|
Carbon-neutral materials, such as
bio-based polymers which consist of biomass materials, have been drawing much
attention recently as alternatives to fossil fuels. This issue features
recent IP trends in technology related to bio-based polymers, analyzing the
number of patent applications related to bio-based polymer technology filed
between 1995 and 2006 at the patent offices of Japan, the U.S., Europe,
China, and Korea. Focusing on patent applications categorized by components, polylactic acid (PLA) is the most popular material for industrial use among
the components of bio-based polymers. In the future, an increase in the
consumption of PLA and its potential market can be expected. |
| ・ |
Appeal Process and Application Grant Rate |
| |
|
Appeals against Decisions of Rejection
are filed frequently in Japan, and the success rate of appeal cases is
relatively high. This article provides an overview of the appeal process and some
relevant statistics which show the importance of utilizing the appeal system in
order to secure patent rights. |
| ・ |
Movements at the JPO: "Double Track" Process in the Decision of
Patent Validity |
| |
|
Further to Shiga IP News, Vol. 25, we
report experts’ opinions regarding the “decision of patent validity” by the
“patent system study panel”. Under the present system, there are two separate
processes in which a decision of patent validity can be made, a so-called “double track”
process: an invalidation trial conducted by the JPO, and an infringement litigation
suit conducted before the court. Since the “double track” process is a heavy burden
on all parties involved, a simple and well-balanced system is desired which
would lead to a prompt
determination of the effective scope of the patent right. |
| Download(321KB) |
|
| Vol. 26 (June 2009) |
| ・ |
Recent IP Trends in Solar Cell Technology |
| |
|
Solar cell technology continues to be
developed as a next-generation energy source. Patent applications related to
dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSC), a popular type of solar cell, have been filed
in great numbers since 1997. According to our investigation, more than 200 DSSC
applications have been filed annually since 2003. Focusing on DSSC component
technologies, the number of applications related to semiconductor films is
larger than that of the other technologies. |
| ・ |
Period for Filing Amendments and/or Divisional Applications
after the Issuance of Decisions by Examiners |
| |
|
In accordance with the 2006 and 2008
revisions, divisional applications and amendments can now be filed under the
following conditions: |
| |
(a) |
After Receipt of a Decision of Allowance |
| |
|
If the original application was filed on
or after April 1, 2007, a divisional application can be filed within 30 days
from the receipt of the Decision of Allowance. However, amendments are not
allowed. |
| |
(b) |
Term for Filing Amendments after
Receipt of a Decision of Rejection |
| |
|
Amendments must be filed simultaneously with an appeal
against a Decision of Rejection within four months from the receipt of the
Decision of Rejection. |
| Download(171KB) |
|
| Vol. 25 (April 2009) |
| ・ |
Recent IP Trends in Regenerative Medicine |
| |
|
Regenerative medicine has attracted
enormous attention as a promising technology. After Dr. Shinya Yamanaka of Kyoto
University first generated iPS cells, many Japanese applicants became involved
in filing patent applications related to such technology. Due to the rapid
growth of technical development in regenerative medicine, the JPO revised the
Examination Guidelines. Under the revised Guidelines, “methods which separate or
purify stem cells removed from a human body”, “methods which cultivate stem
cells”, “methods which differentiate stem cells into tissue cells”, and “methods
which carry out processing before transplanting a tissue or organ removed from a
human body” are now patentable. |
| ・ |
Movements at the JPO Concerning Revisions of the Japanese Patent Law |
| |
|
The JPO took the first step to further discuss
fundamental revisions to the Japanese patent law which was enacted in 1959. A
“patent system study panel” was first held on January 26, 2009, and outlined the
following: revision of the effects of patent rights; promotion of patent
utilization; expeditious and effective dispute resolution; improvement in
quality of patents; establishment of a fast and flexible examination system; and
promotion of international harmonization. Shiga IP News will provide regular
updates on these movements. |
| Download(130KB) |
|
| Vol. 24 (November 2008) |
| ・ |
Overview of the Revisions to the Japanese Patent Law |
| |
|
Revisions effective from April 1, 2009, include the
following: the period for filing an appeal against a Decision of Rejection; and
the license registration system. |
| ・ |
Super Accelerated Examination |
| |
|
In October 2008, the JPO began experimental
implementation of the “Super Accelerated Examination” system. Under this system,
an OA will be issued within one month after filing a request for the Super
Accelerated Examination (under the regular accelerated examination system, the
average period is 2.2 months). To apply for this system, applicants must satisfy
certain conditions. |
| ・ |
Ranking of Companies Based on the Number of Applications |
|
Download(1,087KB) |
|
| Vol. 23 (July 2008) |
| ・ |
Recent Trends in Intellectual Property-Related Activities of Japanese
Applicants |
| |
|
As Japanese companies promote the export of their
technologies and products, their intellectual property strategies are becoming
important, and expenses for IP-related activities are increasing. More Japanese
companies are learning to utilize their patent rights for licensing and
standardization in order to expand their business. |
| ・ |
Recent Trends in Invalidation Trials and Intellectual Property Litigation |
|
|
|
Although the number of intellectual property ligation
cases is still lower than in Europe, the Japanese legal system has gradually
expanded with regard to litigation due to the promotion of the Pro-Patent Policy
by the Japanese government. There are more than 500 infringement litigation
cases based on IP rights handled by the District Courts every year. With regard
to appeals against trial decisions, which include decisions in invalidation
trials and decisions at the examination stage, more than 500 cases have been
filed every year since 2000. The average trial length has decreased for
invalidation trials. This shows that the JPO is making efforts to process trials
more promptly. Similarly, the average trial length for infringement litigation
and appeals against trial decisions at the Courts has also decreased. |
|
Download
(666KB) |
|
| Vol. 22 (February 2008) |
| ・ |
Recent Trends in Patent Applications Filed by Japanese Applicants |
| |
|
In 2006, the number of PCT applications filed by
Japanese applicants totaled 26,000 and Japan ranked second among countries
filing PCT applications. Japanese applicants have recently started to file their
applications not only in Europe and the U.S. but also in emerging nations such
as China, Taiwan, and Singapore. Japanese applicants file a greater number of
patent applications related to displays/acoustics and electronic
appliances/semiconductors. |
| ・ |
Recent court case: Ban on the sale of recycled ink cartridges for ink jet
printers allowed by the Supreme Court |
| |
|
In November 2007, the Supreme Court concluded that the
accused recycled products of Recycle Assist Co. infringe the patent rights of
Canon for a recycled ink cartridge. The judgment defines the criteria regarding
the exhaustion of a patent right and regarding recycled products, and is likely
to be referred to whenever recycled products are sold. |
|
Download (1,174KB) |
|
| Vol. 21 (June 2007) |
| ・ |
Trends at the Japanese Patent Office |
| |
|
A JPO report issued in March 2007 presented the
current JPO policy and statistical data of patent examinations and appeal cases.
According to the report, the JPO encourages global cooperation with overseas
patent offices. The JPO is active in the “patent prosecution highway” with the
USPTO, the KIPO, and the UKPO. (More patent offices have recently joined.) In
addition, the JPO promotes the filing of overseas applications by Japanese
applicants. The statistical data illustrates an increased number of backlogged
unexamined patent applications and the examination wait time. |
|
Download (283KB) |
|
| Vol. 20 (January 2007) |
| ・ |
Revisions to the Japanese Patent Law |
| |
|
The Revisions effective from April 1, 2007, include
the following important points: restriction of allowed amendments after the
issuance of an OA (Article 17bis); additional period to file a
divisional application (Article 44); and restriction of allowed amendments for a
divisional application (Article 17bis, 50bis). |
| ・ |
Hitachi Case Ruled in Favor of Former Employee |
| |
|
On October 17, 2006, the Supreme Court upheld the
Tokyo High Court judgment in which it was accepted that remuneration for an
employee is applicable for overseas patents as well as cross-licensing
agreements. |
|
Download (164KB) |
|
|
BACK
TOP
|